
Locals have a name for when a journalist comes to the city to document how far it has fallen. And at that it only comes off as an apology, at least to this set of eyes.Ī reader can’t fault Binelli for documenting what he has seen that makes the city unattractive - unless that reader lives in Detroit. Binelli knows he can’t justify saying this outright, so he waits until the conclusion, where he can express it with nothing more than a promise that he has a really good feeling. Which is the right call, but you can tell he regrets every page of it, and that he wants to let everyone know about how Detroit’s best years are ahead. In aiming for a general market audience, Binelli doesn’t see a way to write about the city without giving an honest take on what he saw there. It hangs on, tenaciously, creeping over the city like a slow-growing mold, until - this begins to seem inevitable, if you get into a certain mood - the entire place will be nothing but past.Ī great deal of the book is devoted to all the symptoms of Detroit’s predicament.

He writes:ĭetroit, if anything, is a place where the past cannot be shook loose. So, should Detroit attempt to renew what it was? Binelli seems to understand that nostalgia has become a political handicap. Whatever cause is ascribed to an urban resurrection, you can be sure that two major forms of outsider investment will be necessary (if not sufficient) components of a successful recipe: Federal dollars and migration.

Yet when a major American city goes into decline, the question of if and how it will recover it is a question for the whole country. It’s like having an opinion about the rebuilding of New Orleans from the standpoint of Chicago. Maybe I am just projecting, because as I start to write this I can hear people asking how I can have an opinion about what the author has written - or, by extension, of Detroit - when I haven’t lived in or visited the city. The trouble with Detroit City Is the Place to Be is that you can hear author Mark Binelli negotiating with the Detroiters in every sentence, debating between what he wants to say and how locals will react to what he publishes.
